|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 13, 2006 18:40:51 GMT -5
The New York Post raves, proclaiming Toxic Avenger III to be "Troma’s ‘Intolerance,’ with bigger sets and higher aspirations." The third 35mm theatrical hit in director Lloyd Kaufman’s wildly successful Toxic Avenger series finds our hideously deformed creature of superhuman size and strength battling his most formidable foe to date- the Devil himself! He's cleaned up Tromaville. He's conquered Tokyo. The Toxic Avenger series has set a new standard for independent action/comedies, transcending the limitations of low-budget filmmaking to become a bona fide worldwide phenomenon! The Toxic Avenger Part III continues this tradition in high style with eye-popping, gut-wrenching special effects, explosive action, and the unmistakably Tromatic sense of humor.
|
|
Canetoad
The Prodigal Toad 
HMaM member of the Month, July 2006
Cry Havoc! And let slip the cats of war.
Posts: 2,868
|
Post by Canetoad on Aug 13, 2006 18:45:36 GMT -5
Quite possibly the biggest load of tripe the Toad has ever had the misfortune to see. I thought the original Toxic Avenger was pretty neat in the usual Troma fashion, haven't I confess seen II, but as for III - I would pay not to watch this film again.  |
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 13, 2006 18:47:49 GMT -5
Yea part 3 is the worst in the series. I gave it a 2. Part 1 is great, part 2 is still pretty good, and part 4 is on the same level as the original.
|
|
HNT
 Grizzled HMaM Vet 
Horror in General & Everything Else Moderator[/i]
Kiss my tuchis
Posts: 6,296
|
Post by HNT on Aug 13, 2006 19:02:44 GMT -5
This one gets a 2 from me. I find it to be the worst of them all, but it dos again have a laugh or two that keeps it at this level. In all honesty it probably deserves a one. I do not recommend seeing this film unless you loved the first
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 13, 2006 19:07:37 GMT -5
Didn't you just give part 2 a one?
|
|
HNT
Grizzled HMaM Vet
Horror in General & Everything Else Moderator[/i]
Kiss my tuchis
Posts: 6,296
|
Post by HNT on Aug 13, 2006 19:16:16 GMT -5
I think I gave them both a 2. At least that's what I meant to do
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 13, 2006 20:53:35 GMT -5
How could you see part 2 as equal to this though? This one was far worse.
|
|
HNT
Grizzled HMaM Vet
Horror in General & Everything Else Moderator[/i]
Kiss my tuchis
Posts: 6,296
|
Post by HNT on Aug 14, 2006 9:17:33 GMT -5
They both suck. If anything they both deserve a 1 or maybe this one should get a 0 and two should get a 1. I was being generous
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 14, 2006 10:44:45 GMT -5
Im sorry, but 2 is definitely better than this. Part 2 is not great or anything, but it is definitely better than 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Aug 14, 2006 11:07:05 GMT -5
Have not seen it, don't care to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 14, 2006 13:55:45 GMT -5
Sucks anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Aug 14, 2006 16:11:55 GMT -5
That confirms it then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Aug 14, 2006 17:11:49 GMT -5
lol....only reason I got it was cuz I bought the Tox Box with the first 3 movies and the cartoon. It was cheap and its the only way to get Part 2 uncut.
|
|
HMaM Global Mod
