Custodian of the Keep
Post by GP on Feb 4, 2008 5:26:06 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]As I have some time on my hands and I've been perusing the old Horror Inf3ction board I thought I'd dust off and revisit a couple of old reviews as they haven't been done here at HMaM 2.0.[/glow]
Halloween 4 & 5
There are certain conceits in american movies that I love and one is that of the avenging posse of drunken shotgun wielding blue collar 50 year olds in pickup trucks. Another is cheating boyfriend seeks redemption through heroic action and gets his skull crushed. All of which brings me nicely around to this review of Halloween 4: The Return Of Michael Myers. In actual fact I'm going to review Halloween 5 too as I watched them back to back this evening [glow=red,2,300]about five years ago[/glow] and they are different examples of how sequels can contribute to and detract from a series but for now we'll stick with no 4 which is actually the third Michael Myers movie as Halloween 3 was some weird departure that had bugger all to do with the the first two.
HALLOWEEN 4: THE RETURN OF MICHAEL MYERS.
So. Ten years have passed since Michael Myers was consumed in flames along with his arch-enemy Dr.
Loomis and of course he survived and is being transferred between secure hospitals the day before Halloween. Dr. Loomis isn't happy, Myers kills his escorts and is off back to Haddonfield to do serious injury to anyone between him and his niece (daughter of the now dead Laurie Strode) Jamie.
Chaos ensues and many people die so no surprises there then. What IS surprising however is just how good this film is. Danielle Harris is great for such a young actor effectively having to replace Jamie Lee Curtis as the main protagonist and Donald Pleasance is simply awesome in his portayal of the battered and almost crippled Dr. Loomis, never forgetting for a moment to signal pain in his movements and exasperated fatigue in his face.
The photography is crisp and the foreground and background are equally well regarded by the camera and other than the 1.85:1 aspect ratio director Dwight Little crafted a worthy homage to Carpenter's style, POV shots are not used gratuitously and enhance the
tension and the relative lack of gore is adequately compensated for by the movie's effectiveness as a thriller. Alan Howarth's music is low key and efficient, the Halloween theme being used sparingly, the first time following Loomis's confrontation at a dust blown gas station and when it kicked in it genuinely gave me goose bumps. In fact the movie's strength is in its ties to the original. Apart from the obvious constants such as the theme, Donald Pleasance and Michael Myers, the opening titles use the same conventions, there is a lack of the gratuitous nudity which is all too common in the rest of the slasher genre, but the most important factor is the character of the town of Haddonfield. The aforementioned pickup posse are handled well and contribute to the picture of Haddonfield as a scarred town with a traumatic past. The film moves with a sharp pace and builds to a surprising conclusion, reprising one of the key scenes from the original Halloween, and sold beautifully by Donald Pleasance.
In conclusion this is a good example of how, if you're thematically consistent with the original and respect those things that made it a classic then you don't need to reinvent the wheel. One of the victims, when confronted by Myers warns 'Don't try that Halloween sh*t with me!' and that's what the audience say, only half meaning it but hoping 'that Halloween shit' will still work and in this case it does. I actually preferred this to Halloween 2 and the neat ending was especially satisfying but, as we well know, any original twist introduced in a sequel can be easily demolished and devalued by subsequent episodes, which brings me nicely on to Halloween 5: The Revenge Of Michael Myers.
HALLOWEEN 5: THE REVENGE OF MICHAEL MYERS.
There is one great scene in this installment. The sight Of Dr. Loomis laying into Michael with a 2x4 is particularly satisfying but not even Pleasance's delirious penultimate turn as Loomis can save this from utter mediocrity. The chilling uncertainty of the previous climax is swept away as that scene is RE-explained in a fashion all too common in uninspired sequels.
Obviously Michael is up and about again but this time the crux of the plot is that he and Jamie have a psychic link. Yawn. All the things that identified 4 as a respectful and carefully crafted sequel are absent. The music is intrusive and the Halloween theme is battered senseless to the point of having no meaning (despite the score being by Alan Howarth), even lowering itself to the depths of comedy whistles and honks to accompany a slightly goofy pair of policemen. The director uses POV like it's going out of fashion, thereby eliminating any tension as you almost always know where Michael (in his new, slightly rubbish mask) is. The psychic link storyline gives the director an excuse to throw in a 'Nightmare On Elm Street' style dream/reality crossover to no purpose whatsoever. The cleverly constructed 'Traumatised Haddonfield' characters are conspicuously absent, replaced with hugely annoying teenagers who run around waving knives dressed as Michael Myers and DON'T get shot to sh*t by nervous policemen with good memories. The only positives are that the performances from Pleasance and the one year older Danielle Harris are first rate and there is an attempt to introduce a new direction for the series.
The new direction takes the form of a mysterious stranger (you know he's mysterious as he wears a long black coat and a hat) with a tattoo on his wrist matching one (which has miraculously appeared) on Michael's wrist. This is not expanded upon until part VI.
In conclusion then...
[The Good] Halloween 4
[The Bad] Halloween 5
Halloween 4 & 5
There are certain conceits in american movies that I love and one is that of the avenging posse of drunken shotgun wielding blue collar 50 year olds in pickup trucks. Another is cheating boyfriend seeks redemption through heroic action and gets his skull crushed. All of which brings me nicely around to this review of Halloween 4: The Return Of Michael Myers. In actual fact I'm going to review Halloween 5 too as I watched them back to back this evening [glow=red,2,300]about five years ago[/glow] and they are different examples of how sequels can contribute to and detract from a series but for now we'll stick with no 4 which is actually the third Michael Myers movie as Halloween 3 was some weird departure that had bugger all to do with the the first two.
HALLOWEEN 4: THE RETURN OF MICHAEL MYERS.
So. Ten years have passed since Michael Myers was consumed in flames along with his arch-enemy Dr.
Loomis and of course he survived and is being transferred between secure hospitals the day before Halloween. Dr. Loomis isn't happy, Myers kills his escorts and is off back to Haddonfield to do serious injury to anyone between him and his niece (daughter of the now dead Laurie Strode) Jamie.
Chaos ensues and many people die so no surprises there then. What IS surprising however is just how good this film is. Danielle Harris is great for such a young actor effectively having to replace Jamie Lee Curtis as the main protagonist and Donald Pleasance is simply awesome in his portayal of the battered and almost crippled Dr. Loomis, never forgetting for a moment to signal pain in his movements and exasperated fatigue in his face.
The photography is crisp and the foreground and background are equally well regarded by the camera and other than the 1.85:1 aspect ratio director Dwight Little crafted a worthy homage to Carpenter's style, POV shots are not used gratuitously and enhance the
tension and the relative lack of gore is adequately compensated for by the movie's effectiveness as a thriller. Alan Howarth's music is low key and efficient, the Halloween theme being used sparingly, the first time following Loomis's confrontation at a dust blown gas station and when it kicked in it genuinely gave me goose bumps. In fact the movie's strength is in its ties to the original. Apart from the obvious constants such as the theme, Donald Pleasance and Michael Myers, the opening titles use the same conventions, there is a lack of the gratuitous nudity which is all too common in the rest of the slasher genre, but the most important factor is the character of the town of Haddonfield. The aforementioned pickup posse are handled well and contribute to the picture of Haddonfield as a scarred town with a traumatic past. The film moves with a sharp pace and builds to a surprising conclusion, reprising one of the key scenes from the original Halloween, and sold beautifully by Donald Pleasance.
In conclusion this is a good example of how, if you're thematically consistent with the original and respect those things that made it a classic then you don't need to reinvent the wheel. One of the victims, when confronted by Myers warns 'Don't try that Halloween sh*t with me!' and that's what the audience say, only half meaning it but hoping 'that Halloween shit' will still work and in this case it does. I actually preferred this to Halloween 2 and the neat ending was especially satisfying but, as we well know, any original twist introduced in a sequel can be easily demolished and devalued by subsequent episodes, which brings me nicely on to Halloween 5: The Revenge Of Michael Myers.
HALLOWEEN 5: THE REVENGE OF MICHAEL MYERS.
There is one great scene in this installment. The sight Of Dr. Loomis laying into Michael with a 2x4 is particularly satisfying but not even Pleasance's delirious penultimate turn as Loomis can save this from utter mediocrity. The chilling uncertainty of the previous climax is swept away as that scene is RE-explained in a fashion all too common in uninspired sequels.
Obviously Michael is up and about again but this time the crux of the plot is that he and Jamie have a psychic link. Yawn. All the things that identified 4 as a respectful and carefully crafted sequel are absent. The music is intrusive and the Halloween theme is battered senseless to the point of having no meaning (despite the score being by Alan Howarth), even lowering itself to the depths of comedy whistles and honks to accompany a slightly goofy pair of policemen. The director uses POV like it's going out of fashion, thereby eliminating any tension as you almost always know where Michael (in his new, slightly rubbish mask) is. The psychic link storyline gives the director an excuse to throw in a 'Nightmare On Elm Street' style dream/reality crossover to no purpose whatsoever. The cleverly constructed 'Traumatised Haddonfield' characters are conspicuously absent, replaced with hugely annoying teenagers who run around waving knives dressed as Michael Myers and DON'T get shot to sh*t by nervous policemen with good memories. The only positives are that the performances from Pleasance and the one year older Danielle Harris are first rate and there is an attempt to introduce a new direction for the series.
The new direction takes the form of a mysterious stranger (you know he's mysterious as he wears a long black coat and a hat) with a tattoo on his wrist matching one (which has miraculously appeared) on Michael's wrist. This is not expanded upon until part VI.
In conclusion then...
[The Good] Halloween 4
[The Bad] Halloween 5
HMaM Global Mod
